Are you tired of manually backing up your data and storing it on external hard drives or USBs? We've got your back! Cloud backup and storage services are the way forward. They offer seamless and automatic backups of your files, ensuring that you never lose anything important. But with so many options available, how do you choose the right provider? In this blog post, we compare Rackspace vs. AWS Backup to help you make an informed decision.
Rackspace Cloud Backup and Storage
Rackspace is a cloud hosting company that offers a range of cloud services, including cloud backup and storage. Rackspace offers a wide range of hosting plans, each with varying levels of backup and storage options.
Backup Capabilities
Rackspace provides a comprehensive backup solution that offers automated backups and a retention period of up to 30 days. This means that you can restore your files from any point within the last 30 days. Rackspace also offers the option to schedule backups and provides incremental backups to save time and storage space.
Storage Capabilities
Rackspace offers a choice of two storage options: Cloud Files and Cloud Block Storage. Cloud Files is an object-based storage system designed for managing static data, while Cloud Block Storage offers high-performance storage for databases and applications. Both storage options are highly scalable and can be customized to meet individual needs.
AWS Backup and Storage
AWS Backup and Storage is a cloud-based backup and storage service offered by Amazon Web Services. It offers a comprehensive range of backup and recovery solutions for businesses of all sizes.
Backup Capabilities
AWS Backup offers automated backups with customizable retention periods. It provides full, incremental, and differential backups, which help to reduce backup times and storage space. AWS Backup also offers a range of disaster recovery options, including cross-region replication and automated failover.
Storage Capabilities
AWS offers a range of storage options, including Amazon S3, which is a highly scalable object-based storage system designed for managing unstructured data, and Amazon EBS, which offers high-performance block storage for use with EC2 instances. AWS also offers Amazon Glacier, which is designed for the long-term archiving and backup of data.
Comparison
| Rackspace | AWS Backup | |
|---|---|---|
| Backup Capabilities | Automated backups with a retention period of up to 30 days. | Automated backups, customizable retention periods, full, incremental and differential backups. |
| Disaster Recovery | Not mentioned | Cross-region replication, automated failover. |
| Storage Options | Cloud Files and Cloud Block Storage | Amazon S3, Amazon EBS, Amazon Glacier |
| Scalability | Highly scalable | Highly scalable |
Price
Pricing for both Rackspace and AWS Backup is based on usage. Rackspace offers a free trial, after which pricing plans start at $0.03 per GB per month for block storage and $0.01 per GB per month for object storage. AWS Backup offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, with prices starting at $0.023 per GB per month for Amazon S3, $0.10 per GB per month for Amazon EBS, and $0.004 per GB per month for Amazon Glacier.
Conclusion
Both Rackspace and AWS Backup offer excellent cloud backup and storage services, making it difficult to choose a clear winner. Rackspace is an excellent option for those who prioritize affordability, while AWS Backup is ideal for those with more complex needs. Your decision will depend on the specific needs of your business.